Chance and Necessity, Providence and God
This article addresses the issue of difficulties raised by process theology for the traditional understanding of God. Far from new, the issues raised by process thinkers were not unknown to past thinkers, such as Aquinas, who dealt adequately with them. The author argues that the classical view of G...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2005
|
| In: |
Irish theological quarterly
Year: 2005, Volume: 70, Issue: 3, Pages: 263-278 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | This article addresses the issue of difficulties raised by process theology for the traditional understanding of God. Far from new, the issues raised by process thinkers were not unknown to past thinkers, such as Aquinas, who dealt adequately with them. The author argues that the classical view of God, more recently expressed by Lonegran in a more modern idiom, is more in accordance with contemporary scientific thinking on space, time, and matter, than the view of its detractors. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-4989 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Irish theological quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/002114000507000305 |
