Reappropriating Patristic Christology: One Doctrine, Two Styles
Against the background of the history of the formula anhypostasis-enhypostasis, used originally to help define the humanity of Christ, two attempts to find a more contemporary expression of its truth are analysed, one by the Anglican scholar, H. M. Relton, and the other by the Protestant theologian,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2002
|
| In: |
Irish theological quarterly
Year: 2002, Volume: 67, Issue: 3, Pages: 225-239 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Against the background of the history of the formula anhypostasis-enhypostasis, used originally to help define the humanity of Christ, two attempts to find a more contemporary expression of its truth are analysed, one by the Anglican scholar, H. M. Relton, and the other by the Protestant theologian, Karl Barth. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-4989 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Irish theological quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/002114000206700303 |