The "Five"-Category Ontology?: E. J. Lowe and the Ontology of the Divine

E. J. Lowe was a prominent and theistically-inclined philosopher who developed and defended a four-category ontology with roots in Aristotle’s Categories. But Lowe engaged in little philosophical theology and said even less about how a divine being might fit into his considered ontology. This paper...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:TheoLogica
Main Author: Renz, Graham (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain 2021
In: TheoLogica
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Aseity
B Ontology
B E. J. Lowe
B Substance
B God
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:E. J. Lowe was a prominent and theistically-inclined philosopher who developed and defended a four-category ontology with roots in Aristotle’s Categories. But Lowe engaged in little philosophical theology and said even less about how a divine being might fit into his considered ontology. This paper explores ways in which the reality of a divine being might be squared with Lowe’s ontology. I motivate the exploration with a puzzle that suggests Lowe must reject either divine aseity or the traditional view that God is a substance. After showing that the puzzle cannot be overcome by rejecting one of its premises, I consider ways in which Lowe might try to reject the puzzle wholesale. I argue that the best way to reject the puzzle is to countenance a fifth fundamental category, the category of supernatural substance.
ISSN:2593-0265
Contains:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i2.56033