Philo’s Therapeutai: Philosopher’s Dream or Utopian Construction?
This article takes issue, on rhetorical and geographical grounds, with Engberg-Pedersen’s (1999) argument that Philo’s De Vita Contemplativa is a ‘philosopher’s dream’. Further, it is argued that while Philo’s description of the Therapeutai/Therapeutrides is shaped by Hellenistic utopian conventions...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2004
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Year: 2004, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 30-42 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This article takes issue, on rhetorical and geographical grounds, with Engberg-Pedersen’s (1999) argument that Philo’s De Vita Contemplativa is a ‘philosopher’s dream’. Further, it is argued that while Philo’s description of the Therapeutai/Therapeutrides is shaped by Hellenistic utopian conventions, particularly Iambulus’ account of the Islands of the Sun (Diodorus Siculus 2.55-60), Philo’s account is sober and realistic enough to suggest that he was describing a real community of Jewish contemplatives of which he had direct knowledge. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5286 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/095182070401400102 |