Maacah and Ish-Tob
In 2 Sam. 10.6 the relationship between 9< > (=> and 3H J is ambiguous, and the order of items in its military list is peculiar. Also, numbers and referents in 2 Sam. 10.6 do not seem to agree with those in the parallel passage, 1 Chron. 19.7. Furthermore, the expression 3H J is rendered as...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2005
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2005, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 191-199 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | In 2 Sam. 10.6 the relationship between 9< > (=> and 3H J is ambiguous, and the order of items in its military list is peculiar. Also, numbers and referents in 2 Sam. 10.6 do not seem to agree with those in the parallel passage, 1 Chron. 19.7. Furthermore, the expression 3H J is rendered as a proper name in various manuscripts and ancient versions. This article proposes a solution to all the above problems: namely, that (1) the expression J,= is erroneously written after 9< > (=>, and (2) 3H J may be the ethnic qualifier for 9< > (=>, both expressions referring to the same individual. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089205060614 |