Prophetic Conflict in Israelite History: Taking Sides With William G. Dever
William Dever's claim that my paper is outdated, incompetent and treats archae ological data cavalierly is based on a strategy of misrepresentation and misunder standing. The polarization of the debate into competing camps is misleading in terms of the views of the different scholars who are di...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
1996
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Année: 1996, Volume: 21, Numéro: 72, Pages: 25-44 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | William Dever's claim that my paper is outdated, incompetent and treats archae ological data cavalierly is based on a strategy of misrepresentation and misunder standing. The polarization of the debate into competing camps is misleading in terms of the views of the different scholars who are discussed. The rhetoric of his claim to be fostering inter-disciplinary dialogue is not borne out by the tone and arguments of his rejoinder. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/030908929602107202 |