(Why) Was Jesus the Galilean Crucified Alone?: Solving a False Conundrum

One of the objections raised against the hypothesis that Jesus was involved in anti-Roman seditious activity runs as follows: if Jesus was put to death as an insurrectionist, why was he arrested and crucified alone, whilst his followers were left unharmed? Although this is regarded as a real conundru...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bermejo Rubio, Fernando (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2013
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2013, Volume: 36, Issue: 2, Pages: 127-154
Further subjects:B (false) conundrums
B Jesus the Galilean
B Crucifixion
B seditious activity
B Identity
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:One of the objections raised against the hypothesis that Jesus was involved in anti-Roman seditious activity runs as follows: if Jesus was put to death as an insurrectionist, why was he arrested and crucified alone, whilst his followers were left unharmed? Although this is regarded as a real conundrum by the guild, the present article proposes that the question has been incorrectly formulated, because it uncritically assumes that Jesus was indeed crucified alone. The article argues that both sound reasoning and significant evidence point to the fact that some followers of Jesus—or at least people related to him through a shared ideology and/or activities—were sought after and crucified along with him. In turn, this allows us to understand in a novel way the reasons for the collective crucifixion at Golgotha.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X13506166