Texts, Tables and Tablets: A Response to John C. Poirier
John C. Poirier, in ‘The Roll, the Codex, the Wax Tablet and the Synoptic Problem’ (JSNT 35.1: 3-30), argues that Synoptic source critics, particularly F. Gerald Downing and Robert A. Derrenbacker, Jr, have exaggerated and misrepresented the problems with Luke’s use of Matthew on the Farrer Hypothes...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2013
|
| В: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Год: 2013, Том: 35, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 380-387 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Farrer Hypothesis
B Synoptic Problem B wax tablets B Jr B Robert A. Derrenbacker B John C. Poirier |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Не электронный вид
|
| Итог: | John C. Poirier, in ‘The Roll, the Codex, the Wax Tablet and the Synoptic Problem’ (JSNT 35.1: 3-30), argues that Synoptic source critics, particularly F. Gerald Downing and Robert A. Derrenbacker, Jr, have exaggerated and misrepresented the problems with Luke’s use of Matthew on the Farrer Hypothesis, as well as failed to consider the role that the medium of wax tablet may have played in Luke’s use of Matthew on that theory. However, in several areas, Poirier’s argument is problematic, misleading and in need of revision. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X13480082 |
