Texts, Tables and Tablets: A Response to John C. Poirier
John C. Poirier, in ‘The Roll, the Codex, the Wax Tablet and the Synoptic Problem’ (JSNT 35.1: 3-30), argues that Synoptic source critics, particularly F. Gerald Downing and Robert A. Derrenbacker, Jr, have exaggerated and misrepresented the problems with Luke’s use of Matthew on the Farrer Hypothes...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
2013
|
Dans: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Année: 2013, Volume: 35, Numéro: 4, Pages: 380-387 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Farrer Hypothesis
B Synoptic Problem B wax tablets B Jr B Robert A. Derrenbacker B John C. Poirier |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | John C. Poirier, in ‘The Roll, the Codex, the Wax Tablet and the Synoptic Problem’ (JSNT 35.1: 3-30), argues that Synoptic source critics, particularly F. Gerald Downing and Robert A. Derrenbacker, Jr, have exaggerated and misrepresented the problems with Luke’s use of Matthew on the Farrer Hypothesis, as well as failed to consider the role that the medium of wax tablet may have played in Luke’s use of Matthew on that theory. However, in several areas, Poirier’s argument is problematic, misleading and in need of revision. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X13480082 |