Paul in the Stoa Poecile: A Response to Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit (Oxford, 2010)

Troels Engberg-Pedersen offers ‘a coherent reading of Paul that reflects the best available conceptual tools for understanding the world, both his and ours’ (6). These tools include ancient Stoicism, which illuminates the material character of pneuma, and the writings of contemporary theorists Miche...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Levison, John R. 1956- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2011
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2011, Volume: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 415-432
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Troels Engberg-Pedersen offers ‘a coherent reading of Paul that reflects the best available conceptual tools for understanding the world, both his and ours’ (6). These tools include ancient Stoicism, which illuminates the material character of pneuma, and the writings of contemporary theorists Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu, which provide heuristic keys to the interpretation of Paul. This response offers sustained analysis followed by three substantive critiques of Engberg-Pedersen’s use of Stoicism to explain Pauline pneumatology. (1) The Stoic models he constructs do not adequately explain Pauline pneumatology. (2) Stoic models that do not align with his conception of pneuma in Stoicism are neglected. (3) Neglected as well are key texts from Paul’s Jewish heritage—Hebrew Bible, Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls—though in principle Engberg-Pedersen acknowledges the indispensability of this heritage.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X11408003