The Good as God (Romans 5.7)
Citing ancient authors who use the articular substantive adjective [UNKNOWN]γαθός/[UNKNOWN]γαθόν in reference to deity, this article proposes that ΤοÛ[UNKNOWN]γαθο[UNKNOWN] in Rom 5.7 designates God while δικαου refers to any righteous person. This distinction integrates Rom. 5.7 into an argument a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2002
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2002, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 55-70 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Citing ancient authors who use the articular substantive adjective [UNKNOWN]γαθός/[UNKNOWN]γαθόν in reference to deity, this article proposes that ΤοÛ[UNKNOWN]γαθο[UNKNOWN] in Rom 5.7 designates God while δικαου refers to any righteous person. This distinction integrates Rom. 5.7 into an argument a minore ad majus with an ascending series from the ungodly to the righteous person and then to God. The structure of this argument emphasizes the anomaly of the statement in v. 6, which to maintain logical progression should read ‘no one dies for the ungodly’. This verse, however, affirms the contrary, namely that Christ died on behalf of the ungodly. Precisely this anomaly in the logical progression substantiates the commendation of God’s love reiterated in v. 8, which concludes the argument. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X0202500103 |