'That We Might Not Crave Evil' the Structure and Argument of 1 Corinthians 10.1-13

The separate studies of Wayne Meeks and Lawrence Wills have brought the form, structure and function of 1 Cor. 10.1-13 to the forefront of interest on this text and provide an excellent base for re-examination. Meeks's view that the pericope is an exposition of Exod. 32.6 is challenged and modi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Collier, Gary D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 1995
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 1995, Volume: 17, Issue: 55, Pages: 55-75
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The separate studies of Wayne Meeks and Lawrence Wills have brought the form, structure and function of 1 Cor. 10.1-13 to the forefront of interest on this text and provide an excellent base for re-examination. Meeks's view that the pericope is an exposition of Exod. 32.6 is challenged and modified. The pericope is found here to be a midrashic exposition of Num. I 1 in the tradition of Pss. 78 and 106, using Exod. 32.6 as an exegetical device to 'open up' Num. 11. Furthermore, in its context, 10.1-13 is a focused argument against Corinthian wilfulness (craving) to participate in idolatrous practices, even at the expense of others. The pericope functions in context according to its central structure and argument and is not somehow bent unnaturally into service. Even so, it is a tightly argued, self-contained unit, and may have been originally pre-1 Corinthian or even pre-Christian.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9501705503