A New Temple and a New Law: The Unity and Chronicler-based Nature of Luke 1:1-4:22a
The arguments for the separation and relatively late dating of Luke's infancy narrative are not conclusive. On the contrary, while Luke 1 and 2, on analysis, turns out to involve a systematic rewriting of the first part of the Chronicler's history, Luke 3:1-4:22a emerges as its complement...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
1979
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 1979, Volume: 2, Issue: 5, Pages: 21-45 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The arguments for the separation and relatively late dating of Luke's infancy narrative are not conclusive. On the contrary, while Luke 1 and 2, on analysis, turns out to involve a systematic rewriting of the first part of the Chronicler's history, Luke 3:1-4:22a emerges as its complement - a systematic rewriting of the second part of the Chronicler's work (Ezra-Nehemiah). As the Chronicler had once reshaped Israel's history, Luke re shapes the Chronicler, adapting the building of the Temple to the building of the living Temple, Jesus, and adapting the post-exilic reconstruction to build a picture of moral reconstruction (3:1-4:22a). Thus the pervasive influence of the OT (midrash?) is not limited to the infancy narra tives. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X7900200502 |