Negotiable Currencies: Hildegard of Bingen, Mysticism and the Vagaries of the Theoretical

This article argues that, of the leading Continental feminist theorists who have expressed an interest in women's mysticism, most have inadvertently or otherwise taken up the theoretical model of William James, the early-twentieth-century scholar of religion. In particular, Simone de Beauvoir a...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Jones, Sharon (Автор)
Другие авторы: Neal, Diana 1946- (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2003
В: Feminist theology
Год: 2003, Том: 11, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 375-384
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Не электронный вид
Описание
Итог:This article argues that, of the leading Continental feminist theorists who have expressed an interest in women's mysticism, most have inadvertently or otherwise taken up the theoretical model of William James, the early-twentieth-century scholar of religion. In particular, Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray have accepted the view that mysticism operates on an epistemological plane divorced from the categories of rationality and intelligibility. Both thinkers hold that the mystic is typically hysterical, although Irigaray takes a more positive view of the hysteric as a subject position from which the feminine voice is first heard. Through a brief examination of the mystical and political careers of Hildegard of Bingen, we conclude that the theoretical perspective of Julia Kristeva provides a more useful theoretical perspective from which to analyse women's mystical texts.
ISSN:1745-5189
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Feminist theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/096673500301100310