Antibabylonische Polemik im priesterlichen Schöpfungsbericht?
An examination of the suggestion of anti-Babylonian polemics in the priestly creation account-as it is often claimed-shows that there is no evidence for an anti-Babylonian orientation in Genesis 1. This is especially the case in regard to the creation of the heavenly bodies (Gen 1:14–19). Instead we...
| Format: | Electronic Article |
|---|---|
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
2009
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
Year: 2009, Volume: 106, Issue: 2, Pages: 137 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | An examination of the suggestion of anti-Babylonian polemics in the priestly creation account-as it is often claimed-shows that there is no evidence for an anti-Babylonian orientation in Genesis 1. This is especially the case in regard to the creation of the heavenly bodies (Gen 1:14–19). Instead we have to consider that Genesis 1 was part of an Eastern Mediterranean koiné, i.e. a culture area in which during the 7th century BCE a new form of natural science established itself that received its main impulses from Mesopotamia. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1868-7377 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1628/zthk-2009-0001 |