The Grace–Nature Distinction and the Construction of a Systematic Theology
The author considers the ongoing significance of the grace–nature distinction for systematic theology, the role the distinction has made historically, and current debates on its validity. He proposes that two developments advanced by Bernard Lonergan, the scale of values and the four-point hypothesi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage Publ.
2014
|
In: |
Theological studies
Year: 2014, Volume: 75, Issue: 3, Pages: 515-536 |
Further subjects: | B
Bernard Lonergan
B Augustine B scale of values B Henri de Lubac B grace–nature debate B Systematic Theology B Aquinas B trinitarian relations B Karl Rahner |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | The author considers the ongoing significance of the grace–nature distinction for systematic theology, the role the distinction has made historically, and current debates on its validity. He proposes that two developments advanced by Bernard Lonergan, the scale of values and the four-point hypothesis, can reinvigorate the distinction and ground new developments in systematic theology for the future. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040563914538718 |