Reply to Professors Paris, Keenan, and Himes
The authors suggest that their esteemed colleagues misunderstood the central argument of their Theological Studies article, which tried to make clear that, among a variety of documents written during John Paul II's papacy, four significant and unacknowledged shifts were made that cumulatively a...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2006
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Year: 2006, Volume: 67, Issue: 1, Pages: 169-174 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The authors suggest that their esteemed colleagues misunderstood the central argument of their Theological Studies article, which tried to make clear that, among a variety of documents written during John Paul II's papacy, four significant and unacknowledged shifts were made that cumulatively appeared to challenge, but not alter, the long-standing Catholic tradition on the use of technologies to preserve life. The authors restate that argument. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/004056390606700108 |