In Defence of the Laws of War
This essay warns that Nigel Biggar’s permissive reading of the classic, theological just war tradition is problematic especially when combined with his highly contextual approach to the United Nations Charter and laws of war. Two points are made: (1) When compared to Augustine’s grappling with the d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2015
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 298-304 |
Review of: | In defence of war (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press, 2013) (Reed, Esther D.)
|
IxTheo Classification: | CG Christianity and Politics KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NCD Political ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Augustine
B International Law B Book review B Love B Politics B Just War |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This essay warns that Nigel Biggar’s permissive reading of the classic, theological just war tradition is problematic especially when combined with his highly contextual approach to the United Nations Charter and laws of war. Two points are made: (1) When compared to Augustine’s grappling with the disordered loves of the Roman empire—including ‘foreign iniquity’ as an excuse for military action, the animus dominandi, and wars of a kind that generate more war—In Defence of War lacks a political realism robust enough to defend against leaving the laws of war in the hands of the most powerful nations. (2) When compared to Augustine’s engagement with why and how secular law must constitute the conditions for peaceable and ordered co-existence, In Defence of War fails to incorporate into its just war reasoning a defence of the legal regime necessary for the protection of international peace and security. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
Reference: | Kritik in "In Response (2015)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946814565314 |