Nigel Biggar’s Just War: Reflections on jus ad bellum

This paper raises some questions about Biggar’s accounts of the just cause and proportionality criteria for a just war. With respect to just cause, it argues that Biggar is committed to a broader range of justifications for war than one might think. Regarding proportionality, it claims that his acco...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Studies in Christian ethics
Main Author: Fabre, Cécile (Author)
Contributors: Biggar, Nigel 1955- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2015
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 292-297
Review of:In defence of war (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press, 2013) (Fabre, Cécile)
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NCD Political ethics
Further subjects:B Killing
B just cause for war
B last resort
B Book review
B proportionality in war
B Pacifism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This paper raises some questions about Biggar’s accounts of the just cause and proportionality criteria for a just war. With respect to just cause, it argues that Biggar is committed to a broader range of justifications for war than one might think. Regarding proportionality, it claims that his account thereof invites reflection on the morality of conscription, and, more important still, given the book’s main aim—to refute Christian pacifism—in fact should lead him to embrace pacifism.
ISSN:0953-9468
Reference:Kritik in "In Response (2015)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0953946814565313