Response to John Hare
John Hare’s paper successfully exposes philosophical naïvéties and reductive pretensions in the evolutionary research he surveys. But he fails to clarify how ‘God’, on a view such as Dominic Johnson’s, could not be seen merely as a dispensable projection of ‘primitive’ societies, and thus how his ow...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2012
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 25, Issue: 2, Pages: 255-260 |
Further subjects: | B
Theological Ethics
B Evolution B Sacrifice B Natural Theology B Kant |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | John Hare’s paper successfully exposes philosophical naïvéties and reductive pretensions in the evolutionary research he surveys. But he fails to clarify how ‘God’, on a view such as Dominic Johnson’s, could not be seen merely as a dispensable projection of ‘primitive’ societies, and thus how his own continuing commitment to a Kantian ethic might need to be bolstered by a concomitant form of ‘natural theology’ attentive to evolutionary dynamics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946811435391 |