Is Simplicity that Simple? An Assessment of Richard Swinburne’s Argument from Cosmic Fine-Tuning

The teleological argument has received a resurgence in recent years. This is thanks to cosmological data which appears to offer new evidence to indicate that the existence of life is the result of contrivance in the face of staggering improbability. Richard Swinburne argues that cosmic fine-tuning g...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Qureshi-Hurst, Emily ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Routledge 2021
Em: Theology and science
Ano: 2021, Volume: 19, Número: 4, Páginas: 379-389
Classificações IxTheo:AB Filosofia da religião
CF Cristianismo ; Ciência 
NBC Deus
VA Filosofia
Outras palavras-chave:B cosmic fine-tuning
B Richard Swinburne
B Parsimony
B Philosophy of religion
B Cosmology
Acesso em linha: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Descrição
Resumo:The teleological argument has received a resurgence in recent years. This is thanks to cosmological data which appears to offer new evidence to indicate that the existence of life is the result of contrivance in the face of staggering improbability. Richard Swinburne argues that cosmic fine-tuning gives us good evidence to believe in the creator God of classical theism, who has good reasons to create human agents. I assess Swinburne’s use of the “principle of simplicity” as a criterion for selecting the best explanation in this particular case, arguing that it is not as compelling as Swinburne claims.
ISSN:1474-6719
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Theology and science
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2021.1982250