La intervención de Magnus Maximus (383-388) en el conflicto priscilianista
Intervention of the usurper Magnus Maximus in the Priscillianist conflict has been primarily explained as a legitimistic interference of imperial power in ecclesiastical affairs. The aim of this paper is to explore alternative points of view by analysing initiatives of the Augustus of Trier regardin...
| Subtitles: | "Monográfico: La Implantación De Nuevos Fenómenos Religiosos en la Península Ibérica (Siglos III-XI). Acceptaciones, Rechazos Y Compromisos" |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2021
|
| In: |
Hispania sacra
Year: 2021, Volume: 73, Issue: 147, Pages: 67-76 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CG Christianity and Politics KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity RB Church office; congregation |
| Further subjects: | B
Concilio
B Obispo B usurpador B iudicium publicum B Herejía |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Intervention of the usurper Magnus Maximus in the Priscillianist conflict has been primarily explained as a legitimistic interference of imperial power in ecclesiastical affairs. The aim of this paper is to explore alternative points of view by analysing initiatives of the Augustus of Trier regarding bishops involved in the controversy, as well as his personal interpretation of the imperial religious function in religious conflicts after Trier trials. From this comparation emerges an emperor respectful of laws and ecclesiastical tradition. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1988-4265 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Hispania sacra
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3989/hs.2021.006 |