Reading the potentials of Jesus’ “Triumphal Entry” (Luke 19:28–40)

Most scholars recognize the nearly ubiquitous imperial presence throughout the Lukan narrative. Though the traditional scholarly position has been that Luke’s Gospel is an apologetic defense of Christianity for Romans and/or for Christians concerned about the Romans, Luke’s depiction of the so-calle...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review and expositor
Main Author: Dinkler, Michal Beth 1979- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2015
In: Review and expositor
Year: 2015, Volume: 112, Issue: 4, Pages: 525-541
Further subjects:B Triumphal Entry
B Reader-response criticism
B Roman Empire
B Narrative Criticism
B Postcolonial criticism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1775484254
003 DE-627
005 20211027011023.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211026s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0034637315610501  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1775484254 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1775484254 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042985782  |0 (DE-627)769923992  |0 (DE-576)394354303  |4 aut  |a Dinkler, Michal Beth  |d 1979- 
109 |a Dinkler, Michal Beth 1979-  |a Beth Dinkler, Michal 1979- 
245 1 0 |a Reading the potentials of Jesus’ “Triumphal Entry” (Luke 19:28–40) 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Most scholars recognize the nearly ubiquitous imperial presence throughout the Lukan narrative. Though the traditional scholarly position has been that Luke’s Gospel is an apologetic defense of Christianity for Romans and/or for Christians concerned about the Romans, Luke’s depiction of the so-called “Triumphal Entry” (19:28–40) seriously complicates this view. This article begins by briefly outlining two common but diametrically opposed scholarly interpretations of Luke 19:28–40. Then, taking cues especially from reader-response critics and postcolonial theorists, I complicate the problematic premises shared by both readings. I propose that attending to the critical potentialities that emerge within the contexts of both imperialism and the reader–text relationship presents a more promising path between the two interpretive poles. The final section imagines a plurality of proposals regarding potential ancient readings of Luke’s Triumphal Entry pericope. 
650 4 |a Triumphal Entry 
650 4 |a Roman Empire 
650 4 |a Reader-response criticism 
650 4 |a Postcolonial criticism 
650 4 |a Narrative Criticism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Review and expositor  |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1906  |g 112(2015), 4, Seite 525-541  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)779394127  |w (DE-600)2757772-7  |w (DE-576)401709590  |x 2052-9449  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:112  |g year:2015  |g number:4  |g pages:525-541 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0034637315610501  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 112  |j 2015  |e 4  |h 525-541 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3996489609 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1775484254 
LOK |0 005 20211026134724 
LOK |0 008 211026||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-16#03C06C16E5D52C8F2C394E70857C5AA7A8F7AFE0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw