Realistic Hope or Imaginative Exploration? The Identity of Job's Arbiter
Recent studies have highlighted the importance of the litigation motif in Job. A key strand of this motif is Job's calling on a legal functionary to come to his aid. Many attempts have been made to identify such a figure, with the debate largely focusing on whether God or a third party is being...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
1996
|
| In: |
Pacifica
Year: 1996, Volume: 9, Issue: 3, Pages: 243-252 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Recent studies have highlighted the importance of the litigation motif in Job. A key strand of this motif is Job's calling on a legal functionary to come to his aid. Many attempts have been made to identify such a figure, with the debate largely focusing on whether God or a third party is being summoned. It has been argued that Job's underlying desire is for a restored relationship with God, yet neither God nor a person other than God is on view. Indeed, no identifiable figure is envisaged, for Job is exploring any imaginable possibility, rather than hoping realistically. Such a view does most justice to difficult verses like 16:21 and 17:3, and is reinforced by the use in each passage of a different title to describe the figure. One consequence of this conclusion is that crucial passages like 16:18–22 and 19:25–27 are not to be understood as Job affirming a confident faith in either his vindication or resurrection. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1839-2598 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Pacifica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1030570X9600900301 |