Sanctity of Life and the Death of “Baby M”: A Response to Helga Kuhse
In discussions regarding the withholding of extraordinary medical treatment for the severely incapacitated, appeal is often made to the “quality-of-life” rather than to the “sanctity-of-life”. This article explores the background to both theories and argues that the traditional “sanctity-of-life” do...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage Publ.
1994
|
In: |
Pacifica
Year: 1994, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-74 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | In discussions regarding the withholding of extraordinary medical treatment for the severely incapacitated, appeal is often made to the “quality-of-life” rather than to the “sanctity-of-life”. This article explores the background to both theories and argues that the traditional “sanctity-of-life” doctrine remains viable and useful. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1839-2598 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Pacifica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1030570X9400700106 |