Community vs. Individual Development in Christian Social Practice in Ghana

This paper critically explores the development of the individual body space as paramount to the community’s communalism in the pursuit of the practice of diakonia or Christian social practice in Ghana. It argues that the practice of their communalistic values in the Africa community has been overemp...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stiles-Ocran, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2020
In: Diaconia
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 193-208
IxTheo Classification:AG Religious life; material religion
BS Traditional African religions
CB Christian life; spirituality
KBN Sub-Saharan Africa
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This paper critically explores the development of the individual body space as paramount to the community’s communalism in the pursuit of the practice of diakonia or Christian social practice in Ghana. It argues that the practice of their communalistic values in the Africa community has been overemphasized to the detriment of individual members. Based on empirical data gathered through interviews and observation, the paper regards how the practice of ritual servitudes (otherwise known as Trokosi) betrays the generalized concept of African communalism, Ubuntu, as a philosophy that upholds and promotes the dignity of individual members of a community. Ritual servitude is a practice among some communities of West Africa that evades and undermines the body spaces of innocent women and children. It asserts that, for Ghana as well as Africa to ensure gender equality as sustainable development, it is crucial to revisit and inculcate the value of individuality as part of communalism in all development agendas.
ISSN:2196-9027
Contains:Enthalten in: Diaconia
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.13109/diac.2020.11.2.193