Religião comparada, taxonomias e filosofias da ciência do século XIX: Chantepie de la Saussaye e Tiele

It has been generally recognized that an important influence on the development of early phenomenologies of religion was Hegel. It is the purpose of this paper to provide a deep reading of the phenomenologies of C.P. Tiele and P.D. Chantepie de la Saussaye in order to demonstrate the extent of Hegel...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
Authors: Ryba, Thomas 1953- (Author) ; Martins dos Santos Neto, José (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:Portuguese
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: [publisher not identified] 2021
In: Horizonte
Year: 2021, 卷: 19, 发布: 58, Pages: 413-442
Further subjects:B Chantepie de la Saussaye
B Tiele
B Filosofia da Ciência
在线阅读: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
实物特征
总结:It has been generally recognized that an important influence on the development of early phenomenologies of religion was Hegel. It is the purpose of this paper to provide a deep reading of the phenomenologies of C.P. Tiele and P.D. Chantepie de la Saussaye in order to demonstrate the extent of Hegel's influence on their thought. This demonstration proceeds deconstructively (in the Heideggerian, not the Derridean,sense) to establish (a) the questionability of each thinker's claim to represent a unitary science of religion and to show (b) the oppositions between the respective notions of taxonomy and the notions of science of religion. The paper concludes by suggesting that although both thinkers may have appropriated some Hegelian evolutionary elements, their respective conceptions of science were also influenced by the “received” view that lay behind the writings of scientific phenomenologists such as Robison, Hamilton and Whewell
ISSN:2175-5841
Contains:Enthalten in: Horizonte
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2021v19n58p413