Religião comparada, taxonomias e filosofias da ciência do século XIX: Chantepie de la Saussaye e Tiele
It has been generally recognized that an important influence on the development of early phenomenologies of religion was Hegel. It is the purpose of this paper to provide a deep reading of the phenomenologies of C.P. Tiele and P.D. Chantepie de la Saussaye in order to demonstrate the extent of Hegel...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Português |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
[publisher not identified]
2021
|
| Em: |
Horizonte
Ano: 2021, Volume: 19, Número: 58, Páginas: 413-442 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Chantepie de la Saussaye
B Tiele B Filosofia da Ciência |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | It has been generally recognized that an important influence on the development of early phenomenologies of religion was Hegel. It is the purpose of this paper to provide a deep reading of the phenomenologies of C.P. Tiele and P.D. Chantepie de la Saussaye in order to demonstrate the extent of Hegel's influence on their thought. This demonstration proceeds deconstructively (in the Heideggerian, not the Derridean,sense) to establish (a) the questionability of each thinker's claim to represent a unitary science of religion and to show (b) the oppositions between the respective notions of taxonomy and the notions of science of religion. The paper concludes by suggesting that although both thinkers may have appropriated some Hegelian evolutionary elements, their respective conceptions of science were also influenced by the “received” view that lay behind the writings of scientific phenomenologists such as Robison, Hamilton and Whewell |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2175-5841 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Horizonte
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2021v19n58p413 |