The "Dual Sources Account," Predestination, and the Problem of Hell
W. Matthews Grant's "Dual Sources Account" aims at explaining how God causes all creaturely actions while leaving them free in a robust libertarian sense. It includes an account of predestination that is supposed to allow for the possibility that some created persons ultimately spend...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2021
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 103-127 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Grant, W. Matthews
/ Creation theology
/ Predestination
/ Causality
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God NBQ Eschatology |
| Further subjects: | B
Free Will
B Dual Sources Account B Hell |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | W. Matthews Grant's "Dual Sources Account" aims at explaining how God causes all creaturely actions while leaving them free in a robust libertarian sense. It includes an account of predestination that is supposed to allow for the possibility that some created persons ultimately spend eternity in hell. I argue here that the resources Grant provides for understanding why God might permit created persons to end up in hell are, for two different reasons, insufficient. I then provide possible solutions to these two problems, compatible with Grant's account overall, that help show why God might allow hell. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v13i1.3096 |