Der Geschichte im Konkreten begegnen: Antwortversuche von M. Blondel und E. Troeltsch
G. W. Leibniz develops the idea of the vinculum substantiale in order to be able to explain reality by creating unity between the monads by the substantial bond. For M. Blondel, human action is carried by love and the whole of reality is connected in it. With his historical method, E. Troeltsch atte...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
| In: |
Gregorianum
Jahr: 2021, Band: 102, Heft: 2, Seiten: 329-350 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | FA Theologie KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit NBE Anthropologie TA Geschichte VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Troeltsch, Ernst (1865-1923)
B Werkanalyse B Blondel, Maurice (1861-1949) |
| Zusammenfassung: | G. W. Leibniz develops the idea of the vinculum substantiale in order to be able to explain reality by creating unity between the monads by the substantial bond. For M. Blondel, human action is carried by love and the whole of reality is connected in it. With his historical method, E. Troeltsch attempts to explain the reality of history. Only in the knowledge of history the present can be understood. Blondel and Troeltsch capture reality because they do not separate transcendence and immanence. Man can grasp the meaning of reality if he acts in history and understands this action as the realization of the whole reality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0017-4114 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Gregorianum
|
