Reconsidering the John of Revelation
Abstract The historical context of the Revelation of John is a much-debated issue. This article discusses the most popular theories concerning the dating and authorship of Revelation and finds them wanting. Rather than being a composition of an otherwise unknown prophet named John in the late first...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2021
|
In: |
Novum Testamentum
Year: 2021, Volume: 63, Issue: 4, Pages: 505-518 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Revelation
/ Authorship
/ Dating
/ Pseudonym
/ Persecution
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Pseudonymity
B Apocalypse B Revelation B John B Persecution |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Abstract The historical context of the Revelation of John is a much-debated issue. This article discusses the most popular theories concerning the dating and authorship of Revelation and finds them wanting. Rather than being a composition of an otherwise unknown prophet named John in the late first century, it is argued that Revelation should be regarded as one of many pseudonymous apocalypses that are composed in the early second century. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5365 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10001 |