Further Thoughts on Natural Theology, Metaphysics, and Analogy

In this article, I respond to each of the three authors who have engaged my book God in Himself. Regarding Gray Sutanto’s response, I offer comments on his effort to integrate Schleiermacher and Calvin on the human “feeling of dependence” and the sensus divinitatis and to draw upon the insights of B...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duby, Steven J. (Author)
Contributors: Sutanto, N. Gray (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Swain, Scott R. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Velde, Dolf te 1974- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 2021
In: Pro ecclesia
Year: 2021, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 307-321
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B God / Analogy / Metaphysics
IxTheo Classification:FA Theology
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Duns Scotus
B Thomas Aquinas
B Metaphysics
B Analogy
B Natural Theology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In this article, I respond to each of the three authors who have engaged my book God in Himself. Regarding Gray Sutanto’s response, I offer comments on his effort to integrate Schleiermacher and Calvin on the human “feeling of dependence” and the sensus divinitatis and to draw upon the insights of Bonaventure to frame our natural knowledge of God. Regarding Scott Swain’s response, I seek to build on his thoughts about the necessary use of metaphysical concepts by considering some additional biblical material and by clarifying the way in which metaphysical concepts might be treated as developments of ordinary, common human knowledge of reality. Finally, regarding Dolf te Velde’s response, I seek to clarify further why I think Scotus and Aquinas may not be too far apart on the nature of theological predication and why I think Aquinas’ view of analogy and divine simplicity is still sufficient for confirming the veracity of Christian speech about God.
ISSN:2631-8334
Reference:Kritik von "Gevoel and Illumination: Bavinck, Augustine, and Bonaventure on Awareness of God (2021)"
Kritik von "God, Metaphysics, and the Discourse of Theology (2021)"
Kritik von "Analogical Predication and Divine Simplicity (2021)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Pro ecclesia
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/10638512211017251