Überlegungen zu ausgewählten Aspekten der Behandlung des Jeremiabuchs in der Monographie von Benjamin Ziemer „Kritik des Wachstumsmodells“ (2020)
In a massive study, Benjamin Ziemer has launched a scathing stricture of redaction criticism in Old Testament studies. Based on comparative material from an impressive range of Ancient Near Eastern, biblical, early Jewish and early Christian literature, he maintains that diachronic research is unabl...
| Published in: | Biblische Zeitschrift |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill, Ferdinand Schöningh
2021
|
| In: |
Biblische Zeitschrift
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Jeremia 36
/ Textual criticism
/ Journalistic editing
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Redaction Criticism
B Textual Criticism B Book of Jeremiah B Jeremiah 36 B pre-Masoretic idiolect |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In a massive study, Benjamin Ziemer has launched a scathing stricture of redaction criticism in Old Testament studies. Based on comparative material from an impressive range of Ancient Near Eastern, biblical, early Jewish and early Christian literature, he maintains that diachronic research is unable to deliver meaningful reconstructions that reach more than one stage of textual development behind the present biblical text. Moving beyond that boundary would amount to unfettered speculation. While his appraisal is overwhelmingly negative, there is one biblical book on which he endeavors to devise a redaction-critical hypothesis of his own: the book of Jeremiah. The article evaluates Ziemer’s theory on Jeremiah and draws some general conclusions regarding the validity of his verdict on traditional redaction-critical research. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2589-0468 |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "Kritik des Wachstumsmodells (Leiden : Brill, 2020)"
Kommentar zu "Kritik des Wachstumsmodells (Leiden : Brill, 2020)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblische Zeitschrift
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30965/25890468-06502002 |