Theosis and Baptist–Orthodox Discussions

Baptist-Orthodox discussions could take the shape of a continuous and constructive dialogue if their historical understandings of the Bible are investigated based on their specific perspectives on doctrine. Concretely, the idea of theosis, present in Greek Patristics and later used by the Eastern Or...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Simuţ, Corneliu C. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Invalid server response. (JOP server down?)
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2021
В: The ecumenical review
Год: 2021, Том: 73, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 111-130
Индексация IxTheo:KDF Православная церковь
KDG Свободная церковь
KDJ Экуменизм
NBF Христология
NBK Сотериология
Другие ключевые слова:B Баптист
B Deification
B Participation
B Christification
B Orthodox
B perichoresis
B Theosis
B Ecumenical Dialogue
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:Baptist-Orthodox discussions could take the shape of a continuous and constructive dialogue if their historical understandings of the Bible are investigated based on their specific perspectives on doctrine. Concretely, the idea of theosis, present in Greek Patristics and later used by the Eastern Orthodox Church as deification, can be investigated by Baptists in at least three distinct ways: as Christification, as participation, or as perichoresis. All these are prevalent in the works of contemporary Baptist theologians such as Dongsun Cho (United States), Paul Fiddes (United Kingdom), and Emil Bartoș (Romania). Based on the foundation provided by theosis and its range of interpretations, the Baptist-Orthodox dialogue can be further strengthened by a series of common concerns such as apologetics, evangelism, politics, economics, social work, and education.
ISSN:1758-6623
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: The ecumenical review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/erev.12586