Covid-19, Congregational Worship, and Contestation over "Correct" Islam in South Africa

In response to the global Coronavirus pandemic, South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa declared a national lockdown on March 26, 2020, which suspended, among other things, congregational worship. A group of Muslims made an urgent court application for permission to pray in mosques, which was dismi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vahed, Goolam 1961- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: ASRSA 2021
In: Journal for the study of religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-30
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Africa / COVID-19 (Disease) / Pandemic / Personal liberty / Restriction / Church attendance / Mosque / Closing of / Religious freedom
IxTheo Classification:AG Religious life; material religion
BJ Islam
KBN Sub-Saharan Africa
ZB Sociology
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B Zehir Omar
B Covid-19
B Ebrahim Rasool
B UUCSA
B Cyril Ramaphosa
B Mosque closure
B Majlis
B Wifaq
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:In response to the global Coronavirus pandemic, South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa declared a national lockdown on March 26, 2020, which suspended, among other things, congregational worship. A group of Muslims made an urgent court application for permission to pray in mosques, which was dismissed on April 30, 2020, with the judiciary weighing in on the side of the public health good. This struggle over congregational prayers brought into the open, differences among Muslims in South Africa that have been simmering for several decades and raised questions as to how to balance the post-apartheid Constitution's accommodation of religious practices with the needs of a secular state1. Conversely, what should Muslims do when they are required to follow the secular rules of a non-Muslim country that contradict their obligations to the tenets of their faith? The court case underlined the deep divides amongst Muslims and the changing structures of authority. In the absence of a central doctrinal authority the Ulama terrain is highly com-petitive and fraught with antagonistic doctrinal differences. It remains to be seen whether these divisions will boil over into physical confrontation among Muslims, and, with trust in the state dissipating, how Muslims will manage their relationship with the secular state.
ISSN:2413-3027
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17159/2413-3027/2021/v34n1a4