Prospettive epistemologische per un rinnovato approccio al Diritto amministativo canonico
Canonical Administrative Law is very fragmented nowadays mainly due to its references to theorisation in the civil sphere (in the area of state and suprastate) making it essential to state clearly which line of understanding should be followed: the dominant, state form (judicial) or the innovative,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Universidad de Navarra
2017
|
| In: |
Fidelium iura
Year: 2017, Volume: 6, Pages: 89-118 |
| IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Administration
B Administrative law |
| Summary: | Canonical Administrative Law is very fragmented nowadays mainly due to its references to theorisation in the civil sphere (in the area of state and suprastate) making it essential to state clearly which line of understanding should be followed: the dominant, state form (judicial) or the innovative, suprastate form (regulatory)? The epistemological alternative, imposed primarily on users of the material, continues to be the same one as always: a deductive approach based on the final results of relational events (= the Court that applies the Law) or an inductive approach organised around the activity of the Clergy, which works to achieve the objectives that the law (only) sets out to govern. The new approach is also undoubtedly in tune with developing trends in the basic principles of ltalian and German civil administrative law |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Fidelium iura
|