Patriarchal/ Major Archiepiscopal Ordinary Tribunal as Tribunal of Third and Further Instances
This article is an effort to evaluate the competence and the actual functioning of the patriarchal/ major archiepiscopal ordinary tribunal as third instance tribunal. In that connection, a discussion is made on the necessity of third instance competence for a Church sui iuris to be judicially self-s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Undetermined language |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Institution of Oriental Canon Law
2015
|
| In: |
Iustitia
Year: 2015, Volume: 6, Pages: 91-108 |
| IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Procedural law
B Judiciary B Instance B Church law B Eastern Church B Catholic church Codex canonum ecclesiarum orientalium |
| Summary: | This article is an effort to evaluate the competence and the actual functioning of the patriarchal/ major archiepiscopal ordinary tribunal as third instance tribunal. In that connection, a discussion is made on the necessity of third instance competence for a Church sui iuris to be judicially self-sufficient. The functioning of this tribunal is discussed in comparison with the Roman Rota and other territorial tribunals of third instance in the Latin Church. On the basis of the provision of CCEO the study attempts to identify the possible means at the disposal of this Ordinary Tribunal to ensure just and impartial administration of justice at the third and further levels of appeal. The study also explains the rationale behind the incompetence of this tribunal to deal with some reserved cases and deliberates the competence of Roman Rota vis-à-vis the Ordinary Tribunal as the third instance tribunal. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2248-9789 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Iustitia
|