Vom Allgemeinbekannten zum Gerichtsbekannten: Das allmähliche Verschwinden der Notorietät und die Veränderungen des römisch-kanonischen Beweisrechts in der Frühen Neuzeit
From the wellknown to the notorious: The gradual decline of notoriety and changes in romancanon law of proof in the Early New Age. With the establishment of procedural natural rights at the beginning of the 14th century, notoriety, i.e. the declarative condemnation without any further procedure, had...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Print Статья |
| Язык: | Немецкий |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2016
|
| В: |
Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistische Abteilung
Год: 2016, Том: 102, Страницы: 200-241 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | SB Каноническое право |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Новое время
B Право (мотив) B История (мотив) B Доказательство B Оценка доказательств |
| Итог: | From the wellknown to the notorious: The gradual decline of notoriety and changes in romancanon law of proof in the Early New Age. With the establishment of procedural natural rights at the beginning of the 14th century, notoriety, i.e. the declarative condemnation without any further procedure, had become unsuitable. The lawyers hesitated, however, to abandon this specialty of canon law. Instead they sought ways to harmonize the conflicting rules. In Modern Times lawyers became increasingly bold to deny the importance of notoriety or established procedural hindrances. The reactions in the central Europeans territories like Italy, France, and the Empire differed considerably. But towards the 19th century the interest declined. Only canon law kept the notoriety until 1918, whereas in secular legal orders only scarce traces survive. The decline of notoriety, therefore, indicates a slow, but decisive turn in the history of legal procedure. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0323-4142 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Savigny-Stiftung, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistische Abteilung
|
