Canon 1342: Determining which Procedure to follow when there is an Alleged Crime which is not a more grave Delict
Your bishop is faced with an ecclesiastical crime which he cannot avoid addressing using a pen al process. He is asking his diocesan canonist who was probably involved already as the preliminary investigation unfolded to help him address the question in c. 1718 §1, 3°: "whether a judicial provc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Undetermined language |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Canon Law Society of America
2013
|
| In: |
CLSA advisory opinions
Year: 2013, Pages: 113-117 |
| IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Punishment
B Criminal proceedings law B Decree B Sentencing B Criminal law B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1342 |
| Summary: | Your bishop is faced with an ecclesiastical crime which he cannot avoid addressing using a pen al process. He is asking his diocesan canonist who was probably involved already as the preliminary investigation unfolded to help him address the question in c. 1718 §1, 3°: "whether a judicial provcess must be used or, unless the law forbids it, whether the matter must proceed by way of extrajudicial decree." What should guide the diocesan canonist as he advises his bishop? |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: CLSA advisory opinions
|