Nullity of marriage: Canons 1620; 1628
"This case is interesting because of the number of procedural issues it raises: a negative decision in First Instance; an appeal against that decision and a complaint of nullity against that decision; an interlocutory sentence by the Second Instance court, and an appeal against that decision by...
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Soc.
2008
|
| In: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Year: 2008, Pages: 59-64 |
| IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Marriage law
B Catholic Church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1628 B Ehenichtigkeitsverfahren B Nullity of marriage B Catholic Church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1620 |
| Summary: | "This case is interesting because of the number of procedural issues it raises: a negative decision in First Instance; an appeal against that decision and a complaint of nullity against that decision; an interlocutory sentence by the Second Instance court, and an appeal against that decision by Respondent's First Instance advocate. At several points the Rota underscores procedural issues that the case raises, and the two questions to be decided by decree: the nullity of the Appeal Court's interlocutory sentence and whether or not to recommend the case to the Rota. I am grateful to Msgr. Fred Easton for translating the case, and the ponens who made it available. I have made all identifying specifics anonymous." |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|