El recurso extraordinario de revisión y el respeto por la verdad judicial
According to can. 1643, the cases on the state of people do not have res iudicata effects in a way in which, although there are two agreeing decisions, the case can be "reopended" again and in specific circumstances. The ultimate reason of it is salus animarum, and the respected to the tru...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | Undetermined language |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Libreria Ed. Vaticana
2010
|
In: |
"Iustitia et iudicium" ; 4
Year: 2010, Pages: 2011-2030 |
IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
Further subjects: | B
Personal status
B Urteilskonformität B Provida Mater Ecclesia B Dignitas Connubii B Law B Legal remedy B Legal effect B History B Auditing B Rekurs B Procedural law B Proof B Evidence B Marriage process B salus animarum B Civil status law B Judgment |
Summary: | According to can. 1643, the cases on the state of people do not have res iudicata effects in a way in which, although there are two agreeing decisions, the case can be "reopended" again and in specific circumstances. The ultimate reason of it is salus animarum, and the respected to the truth. In this article, under can. 1644 and the arts. 290-291 DC, the different aspects related to the nova causae propositio are analysed. In that way, the subjects legitimated to appeal are established |
---|---|
ISBN: | 8820983524 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: "Iustitia et iudicium" ; 4
|