Prozessabgrenzung und Ökumene. Zu Art. 3 § 2 der Instruktion "Dignitas Connubii"
The competence of a non-Catholic to engage in a case was, according to c. 1646 CIC/1917 not very clear, but the status was clarified by some responsa from the Holy Office in 1928. This interpretation was confirmed several times before Vatican II. Through the development of juridical procedures after...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | Undetermined language |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Libreria Ed. Vaticana
2010
|
In: |
"Iustitia et iudicium" ; 3
Year: 2010, Pages: 1543-1564 |
IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
Further subjects: | B
Provida Mater Ecclesia
B Dignitas Connubii B Law B Ecumene B Party to a legal action B History B Catholic church Codex Iuris Canonici 1983 B Parties to actions B Plaintiff B Procedural law B Catholic church Codex Iuris Canonici 1917 B Right of action B Marriage process B Ehenichtigkeitsverfahren |
Summary: | The competence of a non-Catholic to engage in a case was, according to c. 1646 CIC/1917 not very clear, but the status was clarified by some responsa from the Holy Office in 1928. This interpretation was confirmed several times before Vatican II. Through the development of juridical procedures after Vatican II, the situation was radically changed. Non-Catholics were no longer considered as excommunicated but as brothers and sisters in Christ. Consequently, they were accorded full compedence to engage in cases without restriction in the CIC of 1983. Following the instruction Dignitas Connubii, it appears, that their competence to participate has again been restriced to "legal interests". The authors regrets this decision |
---|---|
ISBN: | 8820983524 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: "Iustitia et iudicium" ; 3
|