Balancing rights of accused cleric and the good of the community: Canons 223, 381 and 1722
The sexual abuse crisis in the Church has raised some difficult issues regarding the balance of the obligations of Church authorities to act in a manner that properly and appropriately deals with the needs of a victim of abuse and the rights of a priest who has been found guilty of such abuse. This...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Εκτύπωση Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2006
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Έτος: 2005, Τόμος: 3, Σελίδες: 101-105 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | SB Κανονικό Δίκαιο, Δημόσιο Εκκλησιαστικό Δίκαιο |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Guter Ruf
B Καθολική Εκκλησία (μοτίβο) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 381 B Καθολική Εκκλησία (μοτίβο) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1722 B Σεξουαλική κακοποίηση (μοτίβο) B Καθολική Εκκλησία (μοτίβο) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 223 |
| Σύνοψη: | The sexual abuse crisis in the Church has raised some difficult issues regarding the balance of the obligations of Church authorities to act in a manner that properly and appropriately deals with the needs of a victim of abuse and the rights of a priest who has been found guilty of such abuse. This balance becomes even more precarious and difficult when only an allegation has been brought forward and before, if at all, there is proof of such an act having been committed. How do we as Church look at balancing th e rights of individuals with the common good of the entire community? |
|---|---|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|
