The Problem of Genesis in Derrida and Daoism

Among the many theories that explain the becoming of all things in the universe, there is a metaphysical viewpoint that all things are originated from one pure origin which is preceded by nothing. This metaphysical viewpoint can be called the idea of genesis. Derrida proposes that this concept of ‘g...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kwok, Sai Hang (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands 2021
In: Sophia
Year: 2021, Volume: 60, Issue: 2, Pages: 441-456
Further subjects:B Daoism
B Derrida
B Genesis
B Time
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1762668939
003 DE-627
005 20210712100750.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210712s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-020-00762-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1762668939 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1762668939 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kwok, Sai Hang  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Kwok, Sai Hang 
245 1 4 |a The Problem of Genesis in Derrida and Daoism 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Among the many theories that explain the becoming of all things in the universe, there is a metaphysical viewpoint that all things are originated from one pure origin which is preceded by nothing. This metaphysical viewpoint can be called the idea of genesis. Derrida proposes that this concept of ‘genesis’ itself is founded upon a contradiction; ‘genesis, …, brings together two contradicting meanings in its concept: one of origin, one of becoming.’ (Jacque Derrida, The Problem of Genesis in Husserl’s Philosophy, trans. Marian Hobson (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 2003), p. xxi.) Based on this paradox, Derrida proposes that all philosophical attempts to recover the pure origin here-and-now, which are categorized as the metaphysics of presence, are impossible. In this paper, I argue that Derrida’s criticism is based on the Augustinian question of time which presupposes that only the present moment is real. Recovery of the origin therefore means to reduce the non-present to the present. I contend that Daoism can respond to Derrida’s criticism because it possesses a nested idea of time—the idea that each present is encompassed by a deeper level of present as the background context. Accordingly, the recovery of origin does not mean to return to an elapsed past but a deeper context of all occurrence. This explains why dao, when it is understood as the origin of things in the world, does not succumb to Derrida’s criticism. Furthermore, it provides an alternative solution to the Derridean paradox of genesis. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Daoism 
650 4 |a Derrida 
650 4 |a Genesis 
650 4 |a Time 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 60(2021), 2, Seite 441-456  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:441-456 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00762-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 60  |j 2021  |e 2  |h 441-456 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3947798474 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1762668939 
LOK |0 005 20210712100750 
LOK |0 008 210712||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SYE 0 0 |a Time magazine