Muslims as "Hui" in Late Imperial and Republican China: A Historical Reconsideration of Social Differentiation and Identity Construction
As a minority in China, Muslims have had to deal with a twofold problem: maintaining the boundary of their group and integrating into larger society. The various responses to this problem in different contexts and under different circumstances are evident in various group identity configurations. Ba...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2019
|
| Em: |
Historical social research
Ano: 2019, Volume: 44, Número: 3, Páginas: 226-263 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
text analysis
B Minoria B Religiosidade B functional analysis B Funktionsanalyse B Historical Analysis B minority policy B Etnicidade B Análise de textos B Diferenciação social B China B Minority B Luhmann B Historische Analyse B Identidade cultural B Secularização B Islã B Estado nacional B Secularization B Identitätsbildung B Discourse Analysis B Política para as minorias B Análise do discurso B Ethnicity B nation state B Identity Formation B Social Differentiation B Cultural Identity B Religiousness |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | As a minority in China, Muslims have had to deal with a twofold problem: maintaining the boundary of their group and integrating into larger society. The various responses to this problem in different contexts and under different circumstances are evident in various group identity configurations. Based on Stausberg, it is proposed that the ways the identities are constructed refer to the dynamics of various types of social differentiation. The author argues that there were divergent identity configurations among Muslim elites regarding their identity sign Huihui in late imperial and post-imperial China, with the former constructed in the direction of religiosity and the latter in the direction of secularity. In the concluding remark, the author suggests a theoretical account of his empirical observation by drawing on elements of Luhmann’s theory of social differentiation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2366-6846 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Historical social research
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.12759/hsr.44.2019.3.226-263 |
