Legitimizing Claims of Special Knowledge: Towards an Epistemic Turn in Religious Studies
A significant function of the category “religion” is demarcating and insulating particular claims of special knowledge — but too often, Religious Studies serves to mystify and defend this function, rather than critically analysing it. Drawing on categories in which claims of special knowledge are ce...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2021
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Temenos
Έτος: 2021, Τόμος: 57, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 17-34 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Θρησκειολογία
/ Θρησκεία
/ Κριτική (μοτίβο)
/ Epistemologische Überzeugung
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΑΑ Θρησκειολογία AB Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας, Κριτική της θρησκείας, Αθεϊσμός |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Σύνοψη: | A significant function of the category “religion” is demarcating and insulating particular claims of special knowledge — but too often, Religious Studies serves to mystify and defend this function, rather than critically analysing it. Drawing on categories in which claims of special knowledge are central, including Gnosticism, conspiracy theories and esotericism, this paper will look at the history of Religious Studies scholars operating within epistemes which it should be critiquing. Yet a focus on multiple and overlapping knowledges, and competition over epistemic capital, suggests a possible future for the social-scientific study of religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2342-7256 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Temenos
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.33356/temenos.107773 |