Wrestling with Spirits: A Medieval Internal Jewish Debate on the Nature of Biblical Angels and its Arabic and Latin Sources
Abstract The article’s point of departure is a debate that took place in about 1290 between Zeraḥyah b. Isaac Ḥen and Hillel b. Samuel, two Jewish-Italian thinkers, that presents us with a surprisingly great variety of Arab, Jewish, and Latin-Christian exegetical and cosmological approaches regardin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
2021
|
In: |
European journal of jewish studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Pages: 201-224 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jewish philosophy
/ Bible
/ Angel
/ Scholasticism
/ Islamic philosophy
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations BH Judaism HA Bible NBH Angelology; demonology |
Further subjects: | B
Avicenna
B Maimonides B Hillel b. Samuel B Zeraḥyah b. Isaac Ḥen B Albert the Great B Thomas Aquinas B Angels B Medieval Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Abstract The article’s point of departure is a debate that took place in about 1290 between Zeraḥyah b. Isaac Ḥen and Hillel b. Samuel, two Jewish-Italian thinkers, that presents us with a surprisingly great variety of Arab, Jewish, and Latin-Christian exegetical and cosmological approaches regarding angelic nature. Zeraḥyah, following the dominant attitude among Arab, Muslim, and Jewish philosophers, strives to interpret the biblical angel-figure either naturalistically or allegorically. Conversely, Hillel cleaves more closely to Christian scholastic conceptions, adhering to the biblical narrative in the literal sense. The struggle between Jacob and the angel (Gen 32) posed one of the most challenging cases, presenting the interpreter with a situation in which an angel did not only appear but was also engaged in bodily contact. In the case of Hillel, his dual commitment as a Jewish Maimonidean heavily influenced by Latin Scholasticism led to the development of a highly unique solution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1872-471X |
Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal of jewish studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1872471X-bja10022 |