Is the Human Being Redeemable? A Self-Defeating Question

Abstract Rosenzweig’s pathos with respect to an ultimate redemption raises the question of the desirability of a state in which so much has to be undone in order to retain nothing but the One, the All, the Eternal, and the True. Similar doubts arise concerning Rosenzweig’s portrayal of the ways that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Main Author: Liska, Vivian 1956- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Rosenzweig, Franz 1886-1929, Der Stern der Erlösung / Human being / Redemption / Possibility
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
BH Judaism
NBK Soteriology
Further subjects:B Finitude
B Messianism
B Franz Rosenzweig
B Franz Kafka
B Walter Benjamin
B History
B totality
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Abstract Rosenzweig’s pathos with respect to an ultimate redemption raises the question of the desirability of a state in which so much has to be undone in order to retain nothing but the One, the All, the Eternal, and the True. Similar doubts arise concerning Rosenzweig’s portrayal of the ways that this state of redemption is anticipated in life: through prayer, love of neighbor, the communal hymn of the We. How accessible are these to “the human being” as such? Rather than arguing against what appears as a grand remnant of the urge for totality, I invoke here two figures whose concepts of redemption partly resemble Rosenzweig’s, but depart from him in ways that make all the difference: Benjamin and Kafka.
ISSN:1477-285X
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341319