The Jewish-Christian Dialogue Jason and Papiscus in Light of the Sinaiticus Fragment
For centuries, the lost Jewish-Christian dialogue Jason and Papiscus was known only through various quotations and summaries from Patristic sources. This changed in 2011 with the publication of a newly discovered, large fragment of Jason and Papiscus known as the Sinaiticus fragment. The current art...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2021]
|
In: |
Harvard theological review
Year: 2021, Volume: 114, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-26 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ariston, Pellaeus, Disputatio Jasonis et Papisci
/ Fragment
|
IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
Further subjects: | B
Epistle of Barnabas
B Jewish-Christian dialogues B Gospel of John B Sophronius B Agrapha B Logos B Aristobulus of Alexandria B Ariston of Pella B Philo B Jason and Papiscus |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | For centuries, the lost Jewish-Christian dialogue Jason and Papiscus was known only through various quotations and summaries from Patristic sources. This changed in 2011 with the publication of a newly discovered, large fragment of Jason and Papiscus known as the Sinaiticus fragment. The current article examines the Sinaiticus fragment, compares it to the previously known remnants of Jason and Papiscus and examines the information from the fragment in relation to other texts. Several important new observations are obtained as a result. This article-for the first time-unites the Sinaiticus fragment with all of the Patristic material related to Jason and Papiscus in one appendix, with all entries newly translated by the author with updated notes. This article also contains new digital images of the Sinaiticus fragment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816021000031 |