Why Not Now?: The 1890 and 1894 Free Methodist Debates on Ordaining Women
This article uses the 1890 and 1894 Free Methodist Church debates on women's ordination as a case study on the discursive construction of gender in evangelical culture. At the turn of the twentieth century, women's roles in religious culture were being debated around the United States in v...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2021]
|
| In: |
Wesley and Methodist studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-68 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KDG Free church RB Church office; congregation |
| Further subjects: | B
Women's Ordination
B gender constructs B rhetorical silencing B Clara Wetherald B Ida Gage |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article uses the 1890 and 1894 Free Methodist Church debates on women's ordination as a case study on the discursive construction of gender in evangelical culture. At the turn of the twentieth century, women's roles in religious culture were being debated around the United States in various denominations, and the decision to ordain women varied greatly depending on biblical interpretation and denominational theology. The rhetorical performances of two female evangelists and General Conference delegates, Clara Wetherald and Ida Gage, will be discussed and used to illustrate how their opponents used organizational silencing in an attempt to write them out of the organizational record. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2291-1731 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Wesley and Methodist studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5325/weslmethstud.13.1.0045 |
